Architectural Design, James Madison University, USA
The ICARSH Conference Scientific Committee consists of researchers and academics with experience across a variety of disciplines. Their role is to help maintain the academic standards of the conference through submission review, constructive feedback, and participation in scholarly discussion.
Prof. Nicholas Brinen
Architectural Design, James Madison University, USA
Dr. Agim Nuhiu
Faculty of Law, State University of Tetovo, Macedonia
Prof. Dr. Jessica Eynard
University of Toulouse Capitole, France
Asst. Prof. Dr. Nazgol Hafizi
Head of Department of Urban Design and Landscape Architecture, Faculty of Design, Arkin University of Creative Arts and Design, Cyprus
Prof. Dr. George J. Sefa Dei
Department of Social Justice Education, Ontario Institute for Studies in Education, University of Toronto, Canada
Prof. Nikolai Baranov
Baltic state technical university Voenmeh, Petersburg State University, Russia
Dr. Kristina Misheva
Faculty of Law, Goce Delcev University in Shtip, Macedonia
Dr. Olga Koshevaliska
Faculty of Law, Goce Delcev University, Macedonia
Prof. Dr. Migena Leskoviku
Head of EU Legislation and Policies Departament , Institute for European Studies , University of Tirana , Albania
Dr. Nuzha Allassad Alhuzail
School of Social Work, Sapir College, Israel
Dr. Zdenko Braičić
University of Zagreb, Faculty of Teacher Education, Croatia
Dr. Rong Zhang
Professor, Nishinippon Institute of Technology, Japan
Academics who hold a PhD, have a solid research record, and possess relevant professional experience are welcome to apply for Scientific Committee membership.
Required Academic and Professional Background
Candidates should be Assistant Professors or hold a higher academic rank at a recognized university, higher education institution, or research center.
Language Skills and Evaluation Responsibilities
Candidates should be proficient in English and able to evaluate submissions fairly and objectively. They should provide useful feedback while following established principles of academic integrity.
Expected Review Contribution
Members are normally asked to review three to four submissions during the year. The timing of reviews can remain flexible to fit individual academic and professional schedules.
Committee members receive a certificate after each conference acknowledging their involvement in the review process and other related academic activities.
Members have opportunities to connect with researchers, practitioners, and specialists from different countries and areas of study.
Members may be considered for positions on the editorial boards of journals published by partner publishers.
Experienced academics who wish to take part in the work of the Scientific Committee are invited to submit an application.
Those interested in contributing to the review process and supporting the academic activities of the conference can complete the form below.
"*" indicates required fields